Sanjida Mahboob

The immunization record was not available for one child.

The primary caregiver stated that she resides in the daycare home Monday through Friday and stays at her personal residence, located at a different address, on weekends.

A food allergy emergency plan for one child with a known food allergy was not available.

The fire extinguisher was not mounted.

The immunization records for three dogs have expired since May 2026.

The health statement for one child was not available during the inspection.

The immunization record for one child was not up to date.

Toddlers were seen walking around with sippy cups and sharing the same sippy cup. This issue was addressed during the inspection when the caregiver took away all the sippy cups.

Children younger than two years were seen watching television. This issue was addressed during the inspection when the caregiver switched off the TV.

Based on the information gathered throughout the investigation, it is concluded that the primary caregiver yelled at the children.

The carbon monoxide detector, smoke detector, and fire extinguisher were not inspected in May and June 2026.

The fire extinguisher was not mounted.

The immunization records for three dogs have expired since May 2026.

A food allergy emergency plan for one child with a known food allergy was not available.

The health statement for one child was not available during the inspection.

The immunization record for one child was not up to date.

The immunization record was not available for one child.

The primary caregiver stated that she resides in the daycare home Monday through Friday and stays at her personal residence, located at a different address, on weekends.

The immunization record was not available for one child.

One member of the household lacked the necessary documentation confirming that the orientation to the child-care home had been completed.

The primary caregiver stated that she resides in the daycare home Monday through Friday and stays at her personal residence, located at a different address, on weekends.

The children's product certification form was not available.

Safety documentation for emergency drills, fire extinguishers, smoke detectors, and emergency evacuation and relocation diagrams was not available.

The health statement for one child was not available during the inspection.

The RCCH was missing the following required postings: The letter or form from the most recent Licensing inspection or investigation , Telephone numbers and , A list of employees.

Infant feeding instructions for one infant were not available.

The immunization record for two children were not up to date.

A food allergy emergency plan for one child with a known food allergy was not available.

The primary caregiver stated that she resides in the daycare home Monday through Friday and stays at her personal residence, located at a different address, on weekends.

The primary caregiver stated that she resides in the daycare home Monday through Friday and stays at her personal residence, located at a different address, on weekends.

The primary caregiver stated that she resides in the daycare home Monday through Friday and stays at her personal residence, located at a different address, on weekends.

A bucket containing water was noticed in the restroom and was accessible to the children. Pictures were taken.

The primary caregiver stated that she resides in the daycare home Monday through Friday and stays at her personal residence, located at a different address, on weekends.

Two out of six children were missing admission information.

Cleaning supplies were observed accessible to the children. This was corrected during the inspection when the primary caregiver removed the cleaning supplies.

The primary caregiver stated that she resides in the daycare home Monday through Friday and stays at her personal residence, located at a different address, on weekends.

An infant, four months of age, was seen sleeping while wearing a bib. This was rectified during the inspection when the primary caregiver took off the bib.

Two out of six children were missing admission information.

The RCCH was found to be out of ratio. During the inspection, seven children were present, ages 4 months, 15 months, 17 months, 18 months, 19 months, and two 4 year old children. This was corrected during the inspection when a parent came to pick up their child.

One child was observed having a diaper change. The primary caregiver washed her own hands but did not wash the child s hands. This was corrected during the inspection after the caregiver was informed of the requirement, and the child s hands were washed.

There was no admission information available for children in care.

The primary caregiver stated that she resides in the daycare home Monday through Friday and stays at her personal residence, located at a different address, on weekends.

The cots were arranged for naptime; however, there was no space between them, preventing the caregiver from walking between the cots.

The restroom was inspected and found to be free from hazards. Cleaning supplies were accessible to children in the kitchen; this was corrected during the inspection when the cleaning supplies were removed.

The primary caregiver allowed a person to be present at the operation before receiving notice from the CBCU regarding the person s eligibility.

The primary caregiver stated that she resides in the daycare home only from Monday to Friday; on weekends, she stays at her own residence, which is located at a different address.

There was no admission information available for children in care.

There was no admission information available for children in care.

A household member indicated that the primary caregiver does not reside in the home where care is given. The primary caregiver's driver's license confirms that he is not living in the residence where care is provided.

Cleaning supplies were noted to be accessible to the children on the top of the counter in the kitchen. This was corrected during the inspection when the products were removed.

The primary caregiver was seen cleaning (vacuuming) her daycare space while the children were present; the children were playing freely as she performed her cleaning tasks. This was corrected during the inspection when the caregiver was warned about this standard.

A caregiver was seen feeding a child without first washing her hands or the child's hands. This issue was addressed during the inspection when the caregiver was instructed to wash her hands and the child's hands.

Two infants were seen sleeping on a sofa. This was corrected during the inspection when the infants were removed from the sofa and placed on nap mats.

A household member indicated that the primary caregiver does not reside in the home where care is given. The primary caregiver's driver's license confirms that he is not living in the residence where care is provided.

During the inspection, there were a total of 8 children present. Among them, 2 children were 13 months old, 2 children were 17 months old, 1 child was 14 months old, 1 child was 4 years old, 1 child was 3 years old, and 1 child was 2 years old. This was corrected during the inspection when parents were contacted, and children were picked up to adhere to the necessary ratios.

An infant, who is 3 months old and unable to roll over, was seen being placed down for a nap on their stomach. The primary caregiver indicated she puts the child in this position because the child's mother insisted that the infant should only sleep on their stomach. This was corrected during the inspection when safe sleep protocols were reviewed and the infant was placed on their back.

Two infants, both 13 months old, were seen resting in a restrictive device (baby bouncer) for about 10 minutes on the upper floor of the house, while the primary caregiver was downstairs. The infants were removed from the bouncers and placed on nap mats.

There was no admission information available for children in care.

It was noted that cleaning supplies were located near food and within reach of children. This was corrected during the inspection when cleaning supplies were removed.

Based on the information gathered throughout the investigation, it is concluded that the presence of animals in the RCCH created conditions that were unsanitary and posed a risk to the health and well‑being of children in care.

Based on the information collected throughout the investigation, it is concluded that the caregiver engaged in personal use of electronic devices (cellphone) during periods when active supervision of children was required.

Based on the information gathered throughout the investigation, it is concluded that the restroom area was not maintained in a manner that kept hazards out of children?s reach, such as personal items, hygiene products, tweezers, nail clippers, and toothbrushes.

Six children were seen receiving care on the upper level of the house, while two additional children were engaged in play on the lower level. The daycare furniture and equipment were situated on the upper floor of the house.

Three dogs were present at the RCCH, but they did not have their immunization records and health statements available during the inspection.

A firearm is kept in the RCCH, but was not locked in a cabinet.

Form 2885 was not available during the inspection.

A daily schedule was not available during the inspection.

Dogs were present at the RCCH, but they did not have their immunization records and health statements available during the inspection.

The emergency preparedness plan was available but were misisng the following topics listed on the Minimum Standars: 1 A,B, C, D, E, F; 2 A, B; 3 A, B, C, 4 and 5.

The household's documentation verifying orientation to the child-care home was not completed at the time of the inspection.

A firearms is kept in the RCCH but was not locked in a cabinet.

The operational policies lacked the following information listed on Minimum standards: 4, 7, 8, 10 and 12.

Regular childcare was found to be taking place in the home for four unrelated children and one related child for compensation.