Building Blocks 4 Life

During inspection there was a non-qualified caregiver was caring for nine children, three months to seventeen months. This was corrected when a qualified caregiver and the director went into the classroom, until another staff arrived.

During inspection it was observed that a staff that does not meet caregiver qualifications was left in charge of nine children, three months to seventeen months.

It was observed that the operation had not moved to their new location and did not inform licensing that they were unable to move on date stated when applying for a change of address.

During the inspection a staff with a background conditons was in charge of a group of children. This was corrected during the inspection when an additional caregivers arrived to the operation.

It was obsereved during the investigation inspection that the infant room had children present that were more than 18 months in age difference.

During investigation inspection it was observed that there was one staff with eleven children present in the classroom.

This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non- compliant based on information obtained. It was discovered a staff did not demonstrate self-control when they were arguing with a parent in the presence of children.

This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant based on information obtained. It was discovered that a child was present in the infant classroom that was more than 18 months older than the youngest child present. At the time there were more than twelve children in care at the operation.

This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant based on information obtained. It was discovered that there were six infants between the ages of 3 months and 15 months that were present with one caregiver.

This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant based on information obtained. It was discovered that a hallway that was not well lite preventing the center staff and parents for observing that a puddle of water was present on the floor, causing a child to slip on the water.

This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant based on information obtained. It was discovered that there was screentime being used in a classroom where children under two years of age were present.

This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant based on information obtained. Based on video obtained during investigation it was discovered a two-year-old child was asleep on a cot with a cup.

This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant based on information obtained. It was discovered that the ceiling in the hallway had a leak causing a puddle to form on the floor.

It was observed during the walkthrough that one classroom had children present with infants that were more than 18 months in age difference. This was corrected when the oldest child was moved to another classroom.

During follow up two caregiver present with background conditons were in charge of a group of children and one of the caregivers was left in charge of the operation at time of inspection. This was corrected during the inspection when two additional caregivers arrived to the operation and the director arrived.

During follow up inspection four of the eight children's files had not been completed with lacking information.

It was observed that an infant was asleep in their stroller/carseat combo with a blanket drapped over their legs. This was corrected at inspection when the caregiver removed the child from the stroller/car seat combo and placed in their crib.

It was observed that both classroom with children present were over ratio for one caregiver present. This was corrected when additional caregivers arrived to the operation.

It was observed the operation policies where not complete with all required policies. A list was left with operation regarding missing policies.

The operation was lacking feeding instructions for all infants not ready for table food.

Eight of ten children's files reviewed were lacking complete address for the child, complete address for their emergency contact, parent signatures that parents rights or operational policies were received, date of admission, health statements and/or emergency authorization for emergency care.

During the inspection two different individuals were present prior to an initial background check being submitted.

Records were maintained in a disorganized manner. The provider had difficulty locating requested items. Upon request, the permit holder was unable to promptly produce organized and complete records. This lack of organization and accessibility impeded the inspection process and does not demonstrate compliance with permit holder responsibilities to maintain accurate, complete, and readily available records for review.

Two of ten children's immunizations records reviewed were missing their all their required immunizations based on their age.

It was observed the operation did not have a list of children on the van, emergency medical forms or parent contact information for each child and an emergency plan.

Five of ten staff records were not available for review during the inspection and the other five were lacking all required information for employees/caregivers. A list was left staff and missing information.

During the inspection the emergency prepardness plan was not available for review.

It was observed that a television was being used during nap time in a classroom.

It was observed that three of nine cribs had loose crib sheets present with one crib having a child in the crib.

One caregiver was not aware of the age of children they were in charge of during naptime. It was also observed that a school age child was present in a classroom alone working on school work.

It was observed in a classroom where a two month old infant was present there were children more than 18 months in age difference present.

An infant was observed sleeping in a bouncer that was placed on the table with a blanket wrapped around them. The child also was not buckled into the bouncer. This was corrected at inspection as the child was removed from the bouncer.

It was observed in the infant classroom there were fifteen children present with two staff.

During a DFPS investigation it was discovered the operation did not have staff files for review during the inspection.

It was discovered during a DFPS investigation that a child was left unattended on the operation's van.

It was discovered during a DFPS investigation that the operation failed to account for all children when unloading the children at the operation.

This standard was investigated as part of an DFPS investigation and found to be in non-compliance. There was evidence of physical abuse by an employee of the operation. It discovered that a staff with background conditions was not following their conditions when they were left in charge of the operation the day of the incident when the director and normal person left in charge had both left for the day.

This standard was investigated as part of an DFPS investigation and found to be in non-compliance. The operation failed to complete an incident report when a child was left on the van.

This standard was investigated as part of an DFPS investigation and found to be in non-compliance. There was evidence of neglect by an employee of the operation. When a child was left on an operational van for over one hour.

This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered the operation was not sharing daily reports with the parents showing when the infant slept, amount of food, sleep times, activities which infant participate in during the day and general mood of the child during the day.

During follow up inspection the center was still lacking infant feeding instructions for infants not on table food. 6/6/25 The operation was lacking feeding instructions for all their infants.

During inspection it was discovered the operation was conducting transportation prior to notification to licensing. The operation corrected at this inspection when they provided written statement they will provide transportation.

It was observed the operation was lacking documentation of fire drills, sheltering in place and sever weather drills.

It was observed that the operation had last verified their annual certification on 1/24/24

The operation was lacking feeding instructions for all their infants.

Operation is lacking a current sanitation Inspection.

It was observed that the van the operation was using for transportation was lacking a child safety alarm.

The operation was lacking transportation training for van drivers.

During review of children's records several where lacking all required information. A list of children and admission information that was lacking was left with operation.

It was observed a child with a food allergy was not on file at operation or posted where food is prepared or served.

It was observed that a child under 12 months of age was laying on a boppy pillow in the crib while awake. This was corrected at inspection when the caregiver removed the child and boppy on the floor.